What Major Shift Did Art Experience Due to the Industrial Revolution

Become Total Text in PDF

Abstract

Modernistic challenges, risks and opportunities of a new technological epitome of human development—the so-called fourth industrial revolution—are covered in this article. Their social costs and consequences are discussed in detail. The impact of the fourth industrial revolution on business evolution is analyzed. Development of information platforms of supply and demand is presented as the cosmos of new business models. When considering the touch on of the fourth industrial revolution on the country, it is concluded that the state has increased command over guild, while changing the mechanisms of interaction between the state and civil society, the evolution of competition and decentralization of power. It is pointed out that the ability of state structures and authorities to arrange to the weather condition of the fourth industrial revolution will determine their survival in the new conditions. If they are able to face up the world of revolutionary change openly, the power to change their land structures, make them transparent and the effectiveness will allow the state to maintain its competitive advantages and withstand the tests of a new technological paradigm of human development. Artificial intelligence is considered in detail as the master commuter of the fourth industrial revolution.

The world is at the very precipice of a new technological revolution that will fundamentally alter our way of being, life, work and ways of interaction with each other. In its scale, telescopic and complexity, the transformation/changes will differ considerably from anything experienced past humanity so far. We even so have no idea how it will evolve, simply one thing becomes apparent: our response should be universal and comprehensive, including all agile participants in world politics, from the public-private sectors to the intellectual and ceremonious society. Klaus Schwab, the founder and Executive Chairman of the Globe Economical Forum in Davos, describes these technological transformations/changes as the fourth industrial revolution.

During the showtime industrial revolution h2o and steam power were used to substitute manual work for car work and develop industrial production, during the second electricity was used to aggrandize and enhance the scale of mass production, during the third electronics and information technology were used  to automate production. And right at present, the third industrial revolution is beingness replaced by the fourth, a digital revolution that has emerged and evolved since the middle of the terminal century. This has been mainly characterized by engineering blending, which blurs the traditional borders betwixt the textile, digital and biological worlds.

Since 1784, steam power, h2o, and equipment for mechanization of production marked the first industrial revolution. Since 1870, the division of labor, electricity, and mass product shaped the character of the second. Since 1969, electronics, it and automation of product accept become the basic features of the third. Tin we identify the master and main features of the side by side revolution?

There are three markers, which show that the present changes practice not represent a follow-up to the third industrial revolution, but demonstrate the starting time of the fourth. These are the speed, scale of changes and their effects on the whole system. The speed of occurrence of new discoveries and technological breakthroughs has never been observed earlier. In contrast to the previous revolutions, the stride of development of the fourth revolution is exponential rather than linear. Furthermore, almost all industrial sectors in nearly every country are being reformatted, and the breadth and depth of changes foreshadow transformation of the whole production, assistants and management systems.

The possibilities of billions of people, connected by mobile devices with powerful computing capacity, large amounts of information storage and access to knowledge, are countless. And these possibilities will be increased with the discovery of new technologies in diverse areas, such every bit artificial intelligence, robotics, autonomous means of transport, the Internet of Things, 3D press, nano-biotechnology, materials science, energy engineering science and quantum computing.

1. Challenges and Opportunities

The 4th industrial revolution, as the previous iii revolutions, has the capacity to increase global income and improve quality of life for peoples of the world. Consumers with textile possibilities and access to the digital world are those who already enjoy its fruits/benefits; through its technologies, new products and services which increase efficiency and comfort for everyone. Taxi request, booking of flying tickets, marketing, making payment, listening to music, flick screening or computer games—we take remote admission to all of them.

In the future, technological innovations will give ascent to significant changes in the industrial procurement, with long-term efficiency gains and productivity in this expanse. Transport and advice costs will be reduced, logistics and global supply chains will be fabricated more efficient, trade margins will be decreased, all this will lead to the opening of new markets and economic growth.

At the same time, the revolution could bring increasing inequality equally a outcome of changes in the labour market. Either automation, which replaces manual labour, or direct replacement of a worker for a auto, could cause an increment in the gap between the income of capital and the income of employees. Nonetheless, it is possible that such replacement of workers will in the hereafter provide a net increment in condom and top-paying occupations and jobs.

This shift has never proceeded smoothly without dandy social expenses. Moreover, near of them took identify in the countries that made this shift too tardily. Thus, the start industrial revolution led to deindustrialization in Bharat (in the 18th century, India produced upwards to 25% of world Gross domestic product, by the mid-twentieth century the share vicious to two%), and in that location was a serious lack of technology in Russia and Turkey. The 2nd industrial revolution caused the Great Low, which resulted in major social shocks not only in the Us, Germany, Argentine republic, only besides mass famine in the colonies (at the expense of which the urban center was getting out of the crisis).

We have not yet generalized information on the consequences of the third industrial revolution. Still, the most preliminary estimates bear witness that deindustrialization of the mail service-Soviet space, series of crises in Latin America are the consequences of such a shift, in which these countries take lagged behind. Alternative examples are Cathay and Korea, which integrated applied science through competent industrial policy and managed to emerge as world leaders after the tertiary technological revolution.

The about preliminary estimates evidence that at least 20% of jobs have been cut. And globalization has led to extremely uneven job cuts in different countries. The imposition of overproduction during the transition of the global crisis did not permit occupying the released labor force on a global scale through the growth of production. And the economical growth around the globe of three-iv% per year does not solve any of its problems.

And so far, it is hard to foresee the likelihood of developing one scenario or some other, simply there are historical prerequisites demonstrating that the event will be a mixture of both versions. Withal, information technology is obvious that talent, rather than uppercase, volition be a crucial factor in the production role during the fourth industrial revolution. It will outcome in the division of labour market place into two master segments: "low-skilled labour/low salary" and "loftier-skilled labour/high salary", a result of which volition be an increment in social tension.

Apart from its crucial economical impact, disparity will also accept a significant social aspect in the context of the fourth industrial revolution. The greatest beneficiaries will exist those who provide intellectual and material majuscule—savers and investors—which explains the widening gap between groups dependent on capital and wage labour. Therefore, technology is ane of the main factors of stagnation, as well equally declining incomes, even in countries with high levels of income: the demand for loftier–skilled labour is growing, but information technology is dropping for medium-skilled labour. As a upshot, the labour market volition be characterized by high demand for highly skilled and unskilled labor, with piffling need for the middle segment.

Resentment could also exist strengthened by the spread of digital technologies and the dynamics of social media in information dissemination . Today more than 30% of the world's population utilise social media platforms for communication, pedagogy and information dissemination. In an ideal earth, these relationships could provide opportunities for edifice bridges among various cultures and, as a result, for unity and cohesion. Nevertheless, these relationships also could create and promote unrealistic and utopian views of the success of an individual or grouping, too equally advise and disseminate extreme (extremist) ideas and ideologies.

The invention of the XXI century was the emergence and quick wins of the data space by social media, which in many respects replaced the traditional media. Thus, according to studies of the international marketing management system HootSuite, equally of Jan 2018 in Belarus more than 49% of the population (four.67 one thousand thousand) are active users of social media. 3.85 million Belarusians use social platforms on smartphones. Merely the near curious fact is that Republic of belarus ranks first in the world in terms of the percentage of women on Facebook (58%). Information technology should exist best-selling that merely viii.half dozen% of Belarusian business pages on Facebook apply ad tools (this is near three times less than the average).

What tin can be connected with such changes? Firstly, social media is a more mobile way of transmitting and receiving information. It expands access to the social network, and today in Republic of belarus only 3.25 meg use the fixed internet, with a constantly increasing speed of access to the network, which makes social networks more than competitive.

Thirdly, there is a deepening democratization of the data space. Earlier information could be provided only by centralized news agencies, now we run across how social networks allow whatever registered account to become a kind of center for the transmission and dissemination of information. Therefore, today the media community is faced with an entirely new phenomenon—bloggers. Bloggers, in contrast with journalists, are not bound by mass media legislation, deed as private individuals and are not responsible for the credibility in the transfer of information. The aforementioned can be said about social media, which leads to consequences in the expanse of quality of transmitted and reported information, likewise equally public security.

Sometimes the anonymity of social media leads to greater risks. Anonymity of accounts provides a broad range of instruments to dispense the information space. Attempts to organize "revolutions through social networks" and as the distressing consequences  of the Arab Spring, rumblings of which we still observe in Syria and Republic of yemen, show, social media requires the evolution of a legal framework that could regulate this sphere. In this regard, in the Republic of Republic of belarus in 2010 in the National security concept, and in 2016 in the adopted New military doctrine provisions on the features of the threat of "hybrid wars" were introduced, namely in the part related to data and psychological methods of destabilization of the state of affairs in the world.

On the i mitt, it is necessary to develop legal support for freedom of oral communication in social media. On the other manus, participants in social networks should feel safe both in terms of admission to authentic data and in terms of moral and psychological protection. The latter factors are important. Over recent years, there has been a not bad number of cases of so-called "hatering", mentally incorrect behavior in social media, which sometimes causes deplorable and tragic consequences. Anonymity and legally undefined aspects of these media create loopholes, including illegitimate and illegal actions. Many social media networks, due to their anonymity, in detail the telegram channel, are used by destructive forces for communication by representatives of criminal and terrorist groups. Therefore, this resource has been recognized as take a chance and blocked on the territory of the Russian Federation. Attempts of numerous information junk shot, misinformation and manipulation of interpretations of already existing information are likewise recorded. All these possess a hybrid threat, which is recognized past experts at the earth level.

In the side by side thirty years, the role of the internet and social media volition only proceeds more than signitifance. Audience coverage will aggrandize through generational change, increasing admission to the cyberspace in new regions and speed of information transmission. Moreover, in some countries social networks are already trying to integrate with due east-governments, banking systems and Agency resource. There is an integration of information, management and payment systems, the procedure of digitalization, which expands the functions of social networks and requires more detailed elaboration of security and the establishment of a qualitatively new framework of legal support for social media functioning.

2. Impact on the Concern

Nowadays significant challenges remain in thinking or anticipating the speeding up of innovation progress and increasing the pace of change, and these factors are the source of abiding surprises even for the most skillful and informed participants. Anyways it has been conspicuously demonstrated in all sectors of economy, that the technology marking the get-go of the fourth industrial revolution has a decisive impact on business concern. The fourth industrial revolution is already happening, information technology is now picking upward and the development of robotics will further digitalize the economy and automate production and services, and expand the use of little-used technologies.

In supply and logistics of many industries, we can find the introduction of new technologies, enabling totally new ways of servicing for existing procurement needs, and, consequently, greatly competing with established production and value chains. A like effect comes from the initiatives of innovative competitors, who due to worldwide digital platforms for inquiry, development, marketing, sales and distribution, tin quickly displace long and well-standing market place participants, past improving quality, speed or cost of providing goods for consumption.

In addition, significant changes on the demand side are arising, every bit the increasing availability of information, constant interest of the consumer and new patterns of consumer beliefs (mainly equally a consequence of admission to mobile networks and information) brand companies adapt ways of development, marketing and delivery of products or services.

Development of information platforms is a core trend. Such platforms combine supply and need and undermine existing production structures, and as examples we can see new business models in the contemporary "sharing" economic system and "on-need" economic system. These platforms ("Uber", "Airbnb", "Alibaba" etc.), hands used on smartphones, bring people, avails and information together, thus creating entirely new ways and means of consuming goods and services. In add-on, they brand easier achieving "wealth" for businesses and individuals easier, changing the personal and professional person sphere of employed. These new business models are chop-chop spreading as a large number of new services are booming, from laundry to shopping, from housekeeping to parking, from massage to transportation.

In full general, there are four main effects of the fourth industrial revolution on business—the bear upon on consumer expectations, on product improvements, on collaborative innovation, and on forms of organization. Tangible products and services can exist enhanced by ways of digital opportunities that make them more valuable. New technologies make assets more sustainable and flexible, while information and analytics are changing the style they are being maintained. The world of individual consumer experience, widely available data services and efficient use of assets requires new forms of cooperation, especially because the speed with which changes are going on. And the emergence of global platforms and other new business models, every bit a outcome, means, that individual capabilities, culture of society and organizational forms should exist revalued.

3. Affect on the State

" The fourth industrial revolution volition change non just what nosotros do, only also who we are. "

Every bit material, biological and digital worlds continue to merge, new technology and platform volition provide expanding opportunities for citizens to interact with regime agencies, to express their views, coordinate their efforts, and fifty-fifty to avoid authorities' supervision. Concurrently, government agencies will receive new technological options to strengthen command over society, based on more than complex and upgraded monitoring systems of digital infrastructure. However, the authorities will be under force per unit area to reconsider their approaches to interaction with civil guild and pursue policies, every bit their central function in the latter will go down with the nativity of new sources of competition, redistribution and decentralization of power arising from new technologies.

Ultimately, the adaptability of regime structures and government will determine their survival. If they are able to accept the world of revolutionary changes, to modify their structures, to brand them transparent and efficient plenty to maintain their competitive advantages, then they will address new challenges. Otherwise, they may face difficult problems to solve.

This will become specially evident in the field of management. When the time of the second industrial revolution coincided with the then existing public policy and decision-making systems, decision makers had time to consider particular issues and formulate necessary solutions or appropriate regulatory frameworks. The unabridged procedure was linear, mechanical, with a strict tiptop-down approach.

Such an approach is not suitable for our time. Given the rapid pace and scale of the touch on of the fourth industrial revolution, legislators and regulators have faced unprecedented challenges and, mostly, institute themselves somewhat helpless.

For instance, how could they protect the interests of consumers and the society in a broad sense while continuing to foster innovation and technological progress? With the introduction of "flexible" public administration, the individual sector has implemented advisable measures to develop software and concern models on a larger calibration. It means that regulators should adjust to a new, ever-irresolute environment, evolving to fully understand what they regulate. For that purpose, the government and regulatory agencies should work closely with business concern and civil society.

4. Touch on on Humanity

The fourth industrial revolution will change not just what nosotros exercise, just also who we are. It volition influence our identity and all related aspects: our perception of privacy, understanding of holding, consumer habits, time that we devote to work and leisure, career evolution, a set of skills and competence, and personal relationships. At the core of this question is the permanent use of smartphones that may cause the loss of 1 of the most important aspects of our existence: to make a pause, to recall and to offset having meaningful conversations.

Privacy is one of the greatest personal challenges posed by new information technologies. Nosotros reflexively realise how of import it is for anybody, though we are enlightened tracking and sharing data most ourselves is a crucial aspect of the new information interaction. The fundamental bug of the impact of the loss of control over our information on our private life in the near future will be only discussed more actively. In addition to breakthroughs in biotechnology and AI that redefine the concept of the homo on the whole and push dorsum the boundaries of life expectancy, noesis and homo capabilities will make us review our moral and ethical norms.

5. Artificial Intelligence (AI) as i of the master drivers of the Fourth Industrial Revolution

Artificial intelligence already exists in our lives, from self-driving cars and drones to virtual assistants who can translate or invest. By virtue of the exponential growth of computing power and the huge amount of accumulated data, the progress in the field of AI has been impressive in contempo years. AI is widely used in creating new types of medicine and developing algorithms which tin can predict our futurity cultural preferences. At the same time, digital production technologies collaborate with the biological world. Engineers, designers, architects combine calculator-aided blueprint systems, additive manufacturing, materials science, and synthetic biology for breakouts in the discovery of symbiosis betwixt microorganisms, our bodies, the substances nosotros swallow, and even the houses nosotros live in.

Artificial intelligence will become the central driver of change according to the polling of 800 leaders of technological companies which was conducted particularly for the 46th World Economical Forum in Davos in 2016. 45% of respondents believe that in 2025, artificial intelligence may exist present on the boards of directors of big companies.

Artificial intelligence used to exist only in science fiction, but now it is one of the near promising and rapidly developing technologies. Express or "weak" AI technologies are already widely used in diverse spheres: from mobile phones and household electronics to armed services products. The development of "stiff" artificial intelligence, which can make informed direction decisions, is on the agenda today. Experts say that the prospect of creating such a engineering science, questions not only the current system of global labor division, just besides the world order and international security system.

Discussions at the briefing organized by the People's republic of china Institute of Contemporary International Relations (CICIR) with the participation of the Stockholm Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) in September 2018 in Beijing showed that AI technologies volition exist used by nuclear powers in the near future to modernize their strategic weapons. The usage of "weak" bogus intelligence (sharpened to solve a specific task) for early alarm of the launch of enemy missiles, also every bit for estimating the possibility of such a launch, tin can requite the armed services command of a nuclear ability additional fourth dimension to decide on the backlash and its scale. New technologies can also upgrade the accuracy of nuclear weapons and the effectiveness of missile defence, improve the protection of nuclear facilities, and provide meliorate data.

At the same fourth dimension, the acceleration of the decision-making procedure of one of the parties volition inevitably push its potential enemies to search for opportunities for faster delivery of nuclear weapons. Such a race between nuclear powers potentially has a serious threat to earth stability, since it will exit less and less fourth dimension to estimate the threat of a missile assault and the expediency of response. Ultimately, information technology cannot be excluded that the countries will be forced to automatize decisions near a retaliatory strike, which can lead to unpredictable consequences. At the same fourth dimension, weaker nuclear powers, feeling vulnerable, in the nearest future may implement an automatic nuclear retaliatory strike system (by analogy with the Soviet "Perimeter" organisation and the American "Operation Looking Glass").

As part of the discussion, information technology was noted that even car learning experts practice not always fully empathize how information technology works. Despite the rapid development of AI technologies, the "black box" problem, when decision-making algorithms remain hidden from developers, remains prevalent. Thus, before trusting artificial intelligence solutions related to the use of lethal weapons, it is necessary to significantly increase their transparency. Still, there is inevitably a contradiction arising from the need to combine the transparency of machine learning mechanisms with their protection from the enemy, since the data used by neural networks can be "poisoned" by intentional manipulations (data poisoning). It is also important to note that military forces due to their work specifics take a fundamentally smaller amount of data for machine learning than civilian companies engaged in AI.

Nevertheless, it is already obvious that in the medium term, AI volition make production, transportation and trade more efficient, improve crop yields, open upwardly many new opportunities for technology development, restructure labor markets and consolidate new approaches to national security and modern armed services system. One of the tendencies can exist peculiarly shocking: eventually, it is impossible to exclude the possibility that countries will have to automatize decisions nigh a retaliatory strike, which can lead to unpredictable consequences. Also the situation is complicated past the fact that autonomous weapons and artificial intelligence are still in the "gray zone" of international law.

It means that countries which are able to develop and use innovations in the field of AI will have practiced prospects for economic growth and for enhancing national security. In contrast, countries that maintain an excessive dependence on outdated infrastructure and economic models will notice information technology difficult to ensure competitiveness.

The United States is a global leader in AI. Companies such as Google, Amazon, Facebook, IBM and hundreds of start-ups conduct extensive research focused on developments in this area. In September 2018, a 2 billion dollar campaign was started in the U.s.a. to develop the adjacent moving ridge of AI technologies with the goal of "turning computers from specialized tools into trouble-solving partners".

At the aforementioned time, Cathay is striving to get a earth leader in AI by 2030. In Oct 2019, China allocated USD 1.6 billion for development in this area, and in 2017 investments amounted to USD 4.9 billion, which was the world'due south largest investment in this sphere.

Although the USA and China are the largest players, the development of AI is global. In Israel and the UK, the sector is developing at a high level. Earlier this yr, the French government appear a major public investment in this surface area. The promotion of innovation in the field of AI is too a key focus of governments in Nippon, Due south Korea and Russia.

In September 2017, Vladimir Putin said that "artificial intelligence is the future non merely for Russian federation, it is the future of all mankind. The ane who becomes the leader in this sphere volition exist the ruler of the world." In Russian federation, in 2017 the capacity of the AI market was less than USD 12 million, and by the terminate of 2020 it is expected to grow to USD 460 meg. The AI market capacity in the industrial sector by 2021 will be USD 380 1000000.

"H ighly automated production does not involve the automation of physical actions and repetitive operations alone, only also the automation of man intellectual activity with its ability to solve non-standard tasks and formulate deep strategic goals."

One-time Google CEO Eric Schmidt believes that both Russian and Chinese leaders realized the importance of this area, not only from the commercial point of view, but also for armed services developments. In May 2018, at a coming together on military construction, Vladimir Putin stated that the production of weapons should focus on the implementation of AI and robotics.

In recent years the AI market in Belarus has grown several times. The High-Tech Park (HTP), which was established in 2005, has almost 400 residents now. In 2018, more than than 70 companies are engaged in AI, of which the most famous are MSQRD, AI Thing, Viber and EPAM. The number of specialists in the field of AI reaches 1,700 people.

The Decree of the President of the Belarus Alexander Lukashenko "On the Development of the Digital Economy", signed at the end of 2017, served as an impulse for the agile development of technologies past IT companies. The main developments in Belarus on AI are applied in the fields of machine industry, wellness care, agriculture, industrial production, finance, transport and environmental protection. Solutions are being adult for automatic vehicles, speech recognition, search technology, calculator vision, increasing the effectiveness of the use of acreage, yield forecasting, etc.

Highly automatic production, changing the configuration of socio-economic and administrative relationships, does not involve the automation of concrete deportment and repetitive operations lonely, only also the automation of human being intellectual activity with its ability to solve non-standard tasks and formulate deep strategic goals. Despite the presence of avant-garde systems that automate certain aspects of homo intellectual activity, it is extremely difficult to realize the ability to solve non-standard tasks and codify deep strategic goals at a high quality level. At the same time, it is necessary to understand that the technology of machine learning in practice proved the possibility of formalization and subsequent implementation throughout figurer technologies of not-algorithmizable processes and subject areas. So nosotros can conclude that high quality in this area is possible.

Now the main thing that is necessary is to understand how safe such an impulse will exist for humanity, the established system of norms and institutions.

Despite the fact that artificial intelligence, as a scientific area, is the source of a great diversity of principles and paradigms, methods of data processing, semantic methods and technologies are currently the most advanced and promising. In particular, algorithmic methods for creating intelligent systems based on formal-logical models, in a full general sense, represent the manner to create syntactic structures that practice not carry information about the content and meaning of data, and therefore systems based on these models tin hardly be chosen intelligent.

Today, the efforts of all professionals to create intelligent expert systems are aimed at the formal expression of such objects as "inference", "meaning", "knowledge" and, based on the practical awareness of the limitations of classical methods, experts increasingly come to understand that without semantic methods and technologies farther progress in the field of artificial intelligence will be incommunicable. Ane way or another, it became clear that without these methods, intelligent systems would be just a game of imitation of communication, argumentation, agreement and purposeful activity. Moreover, the limits of this faux have already been achieved. A good example is the "intelligent" chatbot, which for the first fourth dimension managed to pass the Turing test "at the tests, organized in 2014 by the University of Reading (United Kingdom). At the same fourth dimension, in order to hide the semantic errors associated with the patterned nature of the system, based on statistical methods of syntactic information processing models, the developers came up with a fable according to which the plan is a 13 year old male child from Odessa who does not speak English language well."

Despite the fact that the beginning Eliza bot was written in 1966, we even so cannot talk virtually tremendous progress in this direction. In particular, the bot withal works by certain instructions and relies on pre-formed keywords "understood" by the bot. Each command must exist written by the programmer separately using regular expressions or other forms of string analysis. If the user does not utilize keywords, the bot responds with messages like "sorry, I did not understand." At the same fourth dimension, despite express functionality, such bots sometimes can be constructive. It often concerns electronic legal systems and electronic lawyer systems, since the dialogue between users is served by much greater standardization and formalization.

In addition to bots, search, applied science, economical, medical and armed services systems with elements of artificial intelligence, intriguing plenty, specially for scientists, is the creation of automatic systems for identifying and prioritizing inquiry projects in terms of socio-economical development. In detail, co-ordinate to academician Igor Sokolov, the director of the Research Center "Informatics and Management" of the Russian University of Sciences, separate fragments of this system are already used by the Russian Foundation for Bones Research and some industrial enterprises.

The primary benefits of the implementation of AI should be noted:

• automation and widespread price reduction;
• the emergence of autonomous transport and robotization;
• optimization of logistics processes and supply chains;
• optimization of energy and transport networks;
• development of sensor networks and monitoring of agronomics;
• development of information services and a distributed economy;
• development of personalized medicine, clinical practices and infrastructure for distributed and secure access to medical information;
• the emergence of personal educational trajectories and the development of social engineering;
• creation of autonomous weapons systems.

Of course, large-scale technological development inside these areas and the introduction of relevant results in various aspects of socio-economic practice without proper scientific and economic expertise brings some potential risks.

So, according to many forecasts, AI will already surpass the human intellect by 2035-2050. Notwithstanding, equally nosotros noted at the beginning of the commodity, the current results, despite the seemingly impressive character, are more likely to be in the area of imitating of intellectual action or performing like shooting fish in a barrel algorithmic tasks. Therefore, in our opinion, these dates can be significantly postponed.

"A positive trend in the development of society is possible,provided that the state authorities are able to arrange to the new conditions of the data society."

Recently, there is an stance in the practiced community that AI systems will deprive people of work. In this case, the restructuring of the labor market place, the withdrawal of professions related to the aforementioned blazon of processes and standardized physical manipulations, and the reduction of the working mean solar day are obvious. Only, despite this development of AI systems, undoubtedly, new, creative and highly skilled professions will ascend. Thus, the thesis virtually increasing social inequality in connection with the introduction of AI seems to be incorrect, since the emergence of such professions (provided timely and efficiently organized retraining of personnel and equitable distribution of large additional funds raised from productivity growth and price reduction) will help to overcome the era of alienated, mechanistic labour and to brand the work of interacting with AI systems less complicated and more fascinating.

The speed, scale and bear upon of change on the unabridged systems of the fourth industrial revolution are unprecedented in human history. The challenges and risks of the modern technological epitome of human evolution, its social costs, consequences and contradictions are besides bang-up. Cosmos of new business models on the basis of information platforms of demand and supply, strengthening of control over gild and personality by the state, radical change of mechanisms of interaction of the state with civil society, development of contest and decentralization of ability, creation of artificial intelligence—all these tin can lead to pregnant progress in the development of order and its degradation. A positive tendency in the development of society is possible, provided that the state regime are able to suit to the new weather condition of the information social club.

Bibliography

1. Braudel F. / Material civilization, economy and capitalism, Xv-XVIII centuries. T. Structures of everyday life: the possible and the impossible / 2nd ed.; tr. from fr. 50.E. Kubbel; entry art. Yu.Northward. Afanasyev. -- М.: Publishing House "Ves Mir" (All the World), 2006. – p.592.
2. Virginsky 5.South../ Essays on the History of Science and Engineering of the 16 - Xix Centuries - Moscow: Enlightenment, 1984. – p.287.
3. Grammer of Civilizations / Fernand Braudel; Preface M. Emar; tr. from fr. - М.: Publishing House "Ves Mir" (All the World), 2008. – p.552.
4. John Bernal/ Science in the History of Lodge - Moscow: Strange Literature Publishing Firm - 1956, p.738.
5. Klaus Schwab / Fourth Industrial Revolution / Moscow: Eksmo, 2016, p.208.
6. Kurzweil Ray / Evolution of the Mind; Eksmo - Yard., 2015. – p.352.
7. Michi D., Johnston R. / The computer is the creator; World - Chiliad., 2011. – p.255.
8. Osipov M. S. / Lectures on artificial intelligence; Librokom - M., 2014. – p.272.

bowlingbrines41.blogspot.com

Source: http://eruditio.worldacademy.org/volume-2/issue-6/article/fourth-industrial-revolution-challenges-risks-and-opportunities

Share this post